Difference between revisions of "Smart sensor"

From ISLAB/CAISR
Line 12: Line 12:
 
}}
 
}}
 
Goal: small smart sensors
 
Goal: small smart sensors
 +
 
Motivation:
 
Motivation:
 
Current sensors are "static", detecting just one thing, such as light, sound, or touch, because of which in complex systems such as vehicles or homes many sensors are typically required.
 
Current sensors are "static", detecting just one thing, such as light, sound, or touch, because of which in complex systems such as vehicles or homes many sensors are typically required.
Line 17: Line 18:
 
Alternatively, an ensemble of dynamic sensors could acquire more information than the same number of static sensors.
 
Alternatively, an ensemble of dynamic sensors could acquire more information than the same number of static sensors.
 
Furthermore, if such sensors can be made small, various benefits would emerge: e.g., making arbitrary surfaces embedded with sensors for robots such as intelligent skin, and interesting tasks at the micro scale could potentially be facilitated, such as monitoring cells inside of a person.
 
Furthermore, if such sensors can be made small, various benefits would emerge: e.g., making arbitrary surfaces embedded with sensors for robots such as intelligent skin, and interesting tasks at the micro scale could potentially be facilitated, such as monitoring cells inside of a person.
 +
 
Challenges:  
 
Challenges:  
 
It is unknown how a sensor could be automatically changed into a different kind of sensor, a good strategy for changing a sensor or an ensemble of sensors, and how to achieve this at a small scale.
 
It is unknown how a sensor could be automatically changed into a different kind of sensor, a good strategy for changing a sensor or an ensemble of sensors, and how to achieve this at a small scale.
 +
 
Approach:
 
Approach:
 
The student will  
 
The student will  
 +
 
-Design transitions between some typical sensors
 
-Design transitions between some typical sensors
 +
 
-Design algorithms for calculating information/interestingness for each modality (possibly using change point detection) and for strategically allocating roles (like particles in a particle filter).
 
-Design algorithms for calculating information/interestingness for each modality (possibly using change point detection) and for strategically allocating roles (like particles in a particle filter).
 +
 
-Design a strategy for the micro scale
 
-Design a strategy for the micro scale
 +
 
-Implement a macro-scale proof-of-concept, which can be switched manually or algorithmically, and a smaller proof-of-concept (mini, or micro; nano would be cool but would probably not be possible)
 
-Implement a macro-scale proof-of-concept, which can be switched manually or algorithmically, and a smaller proof-of-concept (mini, or micro; nano would be cool but would probably not be possible)
 +
 
-Evaluate
 
-Evaluate
 +
 
-Thus, students will develop both software, and hardware/electronics  
 
-Thus, students will develop both software, and hardware/electronics  
 +
 
Expected result: some ideas (new knowledge) of how to adapt different sensors, at different scales. Thesis, prototypes, video, hopefully a paper, possibly other such as code
 
Expected result: some ideas (new knowledge) of how to adapt different sensors, at different scales. Thesis, prototypes, video, hopefully a paper, possibly other such as code

Revision as of 17:23, 23 November 2017

Title Smart sensor
Summary Small smart sensors
Keywords Smart sensors, adaptation, sensors
TimeFrame First half of 2018
References Surya G. Nurzaman, Utku Culha, Luzius Brodbeck, Liyu Wang, Fumiya Iida. (2013) Active Sensing System with In Situ Adjustable Sensor Morphology. PLoS ONE 8(12):e84090. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0084090

Robin R. Murphy. Dempster–Shafer Theory for Sensor Fusion in Autonomous Mobile Robots. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ROBOTICS AND AUTOMATION, VOL. 14, NO. 2, APRIL 1998 197.

Prerequisites Projects involving both software, hardware, and electronics require much development/time
Author Can Yang
Supervisor Martin Cooney, (possibly Håkan Petterson)
Level Master
Status Ongoing


Goal: small smart sensors

Motivation: Current sensors are "static", detecting just one thing, such as light, sound, or touch, because of which in complex systems such as vehicles or homes many sensors are typically required. A "smart" sensor which could dynamically adapt itself (to detect different signals) could replace multiple static sensors, leading to less space taken, less cost, less work for installations, a greater ability to operate when changes occur, and possibly even easier repairs (self-healing). Alternatively, an ensemble of dynamic sensors could acquire more information than the same number of static sensors. Furthermore, if such sensors can be made small, various benefits would emerge: e.g., making arbitrary surfaces embedded with sensors for robots such as intelligent skin, and interesting tasks at the micro scale could potentially be facilitated, such as monitoring cells inside of a person.

Challenges: It is unknown how a sensor could be automatically changed into a different kind of sensor, a good strategy for changing a sensor or an ensemble of sensors, and how to achieve this at a small scale.

Approach: The student will

-Design transitions between some typical sensors

-Design algorithms for calculating information/interestingness for each modality (possibly using change point detection) and for strategically allocating roles (like particles in a particle filter).

-Design a strategy for the micro scale

-Implement a macro-scale proof-of-concept, which can be switched manually or algorithmically, and a smaller proof-of-concept (mini, or micro; nano would be cool but would probably not be possible)

-Evaluate

-Thus, students will develop both software, and hardware/electronics

Expected result: some ideas (new knowledge) of how to adapt different sensors, at different scales. Thesis, prototypes, video, hopefully a paper, possibly other such as code