Review
From ISLAB/CAISR
PhD winter conference - Review Process
Step-by-step procedure:
- Every student attending the conference submits paper
- Each PhD student taking the 'Scientific Communication' course shall read three papers and write reviews.
- Each PhD student NOT taking the course shall read a single paper and discuss it with a PhD student taking the course together with a senior.
- If the PhD student NOT taking the course also writes a review and hand in to the senior this could give credits to the course (if he or she is taking the course later) or if he/she discuss it with supervisor.
- Discussion of the papers/reviews:
- Attendances: 1 student taking SC course (3 papers+3 reviews) + 3 students not taking course (each one paper) + seniour (3 papers+3 reviews)
- Pseudo-code for the review-process:
- 'Student taking SC course' (S) reads paper A, B and C and writes review RA, RB and RC.
- The senior reads A, B, C, RA, RB and RC.
- Three other students denoted X, Y and Z not taking the course reads either A, B or C (only one paper).
- S, the senior, X, Y and Z meet up and discuss the reviews and the papers.
At the end of the process the group should fill in the report: http://www2.hh.se/staff/vero/cc/form1.pdf
