Difference between revisions of "WG211/M16Laemmel"

From WG 2.11
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 7: Line 7:
 
* et al.
 
* et al.
  
Megamodels reside at different abstraction levels:
+
Megamodels may reside at different abstraction levels:
 
* Scripting (in the scope of model repositories)
 
* Scripting (in the scope of model repositories)
 
* Modeling (in the scope of linguistic architecture)
 
* Modeling (in the scope of linguistic architecture)
Line 13: Line 13:
 
* et al.
 
* et al.
  
We present a use case for compiling higher level megamodels to lower level megamodels. The domain of interest is concerned with software transformation---with bidirectional transformations specifically. The higher level is concerned with logic properties of transformations such as universal consistency properties between artifacts or interest. The lower level is concerned with testing-related properties around individual artifacts.
+
We study the compilation of higher-level megamodels to lower-level megamodels. The domain of interest is concerned with software transformation---with bidirectional transformations specifically. The higher level is concerned with logic properties of transformations such as universal consistency properties between artifacts or interest. The lower level is concerned with testing-related properties around individual artifacts.

Revision as of 01:40, 5 August 2016

Ralf Lämmel: Compilation of megamodels

Megamodels have been used in diverse contexts:

  • model management
  • software architecture
  • technology documentation
  • et al.

Megamodels may reside at different abstraction levels:

  • Scripting (in the scope of model repositories)
  • Modeling (in the scope of linguistic architecture)
  • Verification (in the scope of testing)
  • et al.

We study the compilation of higher-level megamodels to lower-level megamodels. The domain of interest is concerned with software transformation---with bidirectional transformations specifically. The higher level is concerned with logic properties of transformations such as universal consistency properties between artifacts or interest. The lower level is concerned with testing-related properties around individual artifacts.